If I came up with the cure for cancer, I would have much more than a million dollars...I would have billions of dollars. So I would pick that. But if you meant for there to "be a cure" for cancer not "make a cure" for cancer, then I would much rather have a million. My only motivation for choosing the cure was to get tha paper.
I would take the cure, because I couldn't live with myself if I knew that I choose to have a million dollars for myself over saving the lives of a million or more people.
definitely a cure for cancer. ever watch someone waste away because their body is full of tumors? so not worth a million dollars. people's lives are worth more than that.
i think taking the money to donate to foundations that study cures would be my thing, it's what i did in denver. it makes you feel good to give $$ to something meaningful like that, ya know?
dustin, that's so sweet of you. Laura, she didn't say you'd have to watch...still same answer? I'd still take the money, you guys are crazy...or maybe...I'm crazy.
yeah same answer. i couldnt choose money over the health and well being of others. i'm just saying that cancer is a debilitationg affliction, and nobody deserves to have it.
Amy, you should answer your questions too! I like your questions but I never know what you would answer...maybe it's just your job to ask and ours to answer.
12 Comments:
At December 13, 2004 11:07 AM,
Psychomoore said…
If I came up with the cure for cancer, I would have much more than a million dollars...I would have billions of dollars. So I would pick that. But if you meant for there to "be a cure" for cancer not "make a cure" for cancer, then I would much rather have a million. My only motivation for choosing the cure was to get tha paper.
At December 13, 2004 3:15 PM,
Sean the Barbarian said…
I'd take the mil. Unless I had cancer.
At December 13, 2004 4:19 PM,
kings_fan10 said…
I would take the cure, because I couldn't live with myself if I knew that I choose to have a million dollars for myself over saving the lives of a million or more people.
At December 13, 2004 9:30 PM,
supergirl said…
definitely a cure for cancer. ever watch someone waste away because their body is full of tumors? so not worth a million dollars. people's lives are worth more than that.
At December 13, 2004 9:37 PM,
Anonymous said…
i think taking the money to donate to foundations that study cures would be my thing, it's what i did in denver. it makes you feel good to give $$ to something meaningful like that, ya know?
and btw, i'm home-yay!
~hayley
At December 14, 2004 6:50 AM,
Psychomoore said…
dustin, that's so sweet of you. Laura, she didn't say you'd have to watch...still same answer? I'd still take the money, you guys are crazy...or maybe...I'm crazy.
SKRAIT!
At December 14, 2004 10:34 AM,
Sean the Barbarian said…
word
At December 14, 2004 12:00 PM,
supergirl said…
yeah same answer. i couldnt choose money over the health and well being of others. i'm just saying that cancer is a debilitationg affliction, and nobody deserves to have it.
At December 15, 2004 12:41 PM,
PBandJ said…
Amy: It's Reel Big Fish that redid 99 balloons, not catch-22. Just kidding.
At December 16, 2004 9:01 AM,
Psychomoore said…
Amy, you should answer your questions too! I like your questions but I never know what you would answer...maybe it's just your job to ask and ours to answer.
At December 17, 2004 9:35 AM,
Amydear said…
I'll answer them if you want Brett. I would definatly do the cure for cancer, no questions asked.
At December 18, 2004 12:45 PM,
Starryeyed said…
I think that if you cured cancer, you would probably get well over a milliobn dollars, so I would take the cure, cuz it works out better for everyone.
Post a Comment
<< Home